A flexible standard for impact measurement
The Common Framework allows for each organization to choose the measures it finds to be the most meaningful, and their funders, collaborators and networks can aggregate those measures.
The guidelines define a flexible standard.
The Common Framework is composed of guidelines that define a flexible standard for measuring social and environmental impact.
This document outlines how a flexible standard can be created for social and environmental indicators.
I think one of the reasons why we struggle to have a standard in social impact measurement is we’ve been really fixated on the idea that it has to be measurement based-equivalence, rather than the idea of ‘these are just different ways of getting at the same idea; let’s focus on that idea’. Let’s focus on what it means to have a good job and let definition and measurement be flexible so it can be the most appropriate for that particular organization.
What do we mean by impact measurement?
Impact and impact measurement are both terms with many meanings.
More like this
For the standard to grow, people and organizations need to be able to demonstrate that they are using the Common Approach. Social purpose organizations aligning with all five practices, trainers and consultants, developers can request use of the identifier.
Kate Ruff describes the indicator research done with social enterprises using sustainable food systems (SDG-2) and decent work (SDG-8) for the case study.
Kate Ruff and Elizabeth Searing describe the organizational information and financial indicators that are part of the Common Form.